Archive for August, 2007

Applying formulas

Friday, August 31st, 2007

BI8606.jpgOne of the things I am often conflicted about is when I read or hear about “the way to shoot” a particular subject. For example, for shorebirds, the way that is often proclaimed as the best way to shoot them is on your belly, as low as you can possibly go. This creates the nice blurred surroundings and really makes the bird pop in the frame. It is the way I shot this Least Sandpiper – flat on my belly in the sand. I don’t disagree that it creates a very appealing portrait. It is much more intimate than one from a standing position.

But quite frankly, as much as I like to play the skeptic at times, and as much as I tried shooting shorebirds ‘another way’ – I ultimately return to this method. And I don’t know if this is partly preconditioning on how an ‘acceptable’ shorebird photograph should look, or simply because it is an equation that works.

I think this is a line we probably all walk once we learn certain techniques. Certainly I think thi s sandpiper image is better this way than if I shot it from standing or even kneeling. However, I don’t think I was all that creative about it. I simply followed a formula and waited for a moment and had the right light. This bird didn’t stick around long enough to really try too many other things. And even if I did have the opportunity, I might have trashed everything else and ended up with the same image as my ‘keepers.’

I don’t think formulas yield particularly creative images, but can be useful in helping someone go beyond where they may have been before. What formulas do you like or dislike using?

  • Share/Bookmark

Nature Photography page 1

Monday, August 27th, 2007

google-page1.jpg

WooHoo! Google Page 1! 8O

For the longest time I have been trying to improve my Google rankings for the generic term of “nature photography.” It is a little side quest I have had – working on it a little at a time. I don’t get a huge amount of traffic from this particular search term, but any exposure helps. It seemed like I was stuck on page 5 forever, and bounced into oblivion a couple of times. Then I began moving up to page 2 with slight tweaks here and there to my links and page titles. Today is the first I noticed I have finally made it to the top 10!

For all I know, it may be a short lived celebration. Google can be rather fickle as they continue to update their search algorithms. One day you may be #1, and the next crawl who knows. SEO (Search Engine Optimization) seems to be a few parts know-how with a big dash of black magic. An entire industry has been created around this. I have been steadily updating various pages around my site based upon SEO articles I stumble upon, working at keeping the site up to date, with relevant content, new images, and some of it seems to have helped.

It is difficult to pinpoint the exact changes that made the biggest difference. I suppose if I was a bit more systematic about it, it would be easier to track. If I knew the golden rule – I might be retiring soon. I know for sure that having a blog that is updated on a regular basis helps. Blogs have a lot of text for search engines to pick apart. Many businesses are realizing this and starting blogs of their own.

There are A LOT of nature photography sites. Total 81 pages worth at the time of this posting. Some are updated frequently, others have some cobwebs on them. It can be a complete mystery at times in what the differences are between page 1 and page 5. Nevertheless, it is wise not to get too comfortable. Continue to follow the advice of the search engine owners and you should do OK.

So I think I will open a bottle of wine tonight, well knowing that the time on page 1 may come and go as easily as this bottle. :) Wanna trade links? ;-)

  • Share/Bookmark

Gallery Canvas Panels

Sunday, August 26th, 2007

Gallery canvas panel

These Gallery Canvas Panels are something I have just started doing this year. I created a few ‘prototypes’ and I liked them so much I ended up hanging one over my fireplace (above). They offer a unique alternative to the matted and framed photograph, especially when dealing with the cost to mat and frame a 20×30 or 24×36 print. There is really no limit to the configurations you can place them in.

grafpanel1.jpgThese are prints on fine art canvas, using pigment inks from my Epson 4800 and mounted on stretcher bars in a gallery wrap style. Gallery wrap meaning that the image wraps around all sides instead of having a white edge. All stapling is also done on the back instead of the edges. Because my compositions can have important details edge to edge, I had to develop a way to not loose that around the sides of the canvas panel.

I finally got around to creating a page that goes into more detail about these panels and established menu items for people to order them from. Please check out the page here and let me know what you think of this different type of presentation.

  • Share/Bookmark

Inspiration and fermentation

Saturday, August 25th, 2007

I recently saw Greg Lato’s post where he describes some images that he has had sitting around for a couple of years contemplating what to do with them. Dan Sroka also wrote about this recently. I can relate to this completely. Quite often we capture images because something instinctively tells us to take the shot. Later on, upon reviewing them at home, our conscious inner judge takes over and we are left scratching our head on why we made that image.

RO8594.jpgQuite often it take awhile to stew certain shots, or when you perhaps learn a new technique to process them, or see something that makes you go – “Ah HA!” Well, similar to Greg, I have had some beach detail shots sitting around for awhile from my trip to Dominica back in Feb 2006. I processed some of them, and I had a bunch sitting around for ‘another day.’ Well, Greg’s post and awesome collection on sand pattern shots gave me the visual cue that these types of shots look very nice with a light sepia toning to them. I previously processed some with a rich, deep, darker tone – but there were some images where it didn’t seem to stick.

So a year and half later, I went back and processed a few of them in light sepia, and I like the look! I think it brings a certain elegant texture to the images. I don’t know why I didn’t do it before – but when you are processing hundreds of shots from a trip, time gets away from you. You are judging with a different part of your brain than the part active at the time of capture. Sometimes it takes some fermentation and perhaps some new inspiration to take another look at what you might have been seeing in the first place.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Dark age of Digital Printing

Thursday, August 23rd, 2007

Anyone that prints their own work knows for all the enjoyment it can offer in having the ulimate control, it is plagued by an assortment of frustrations. If my Epson 4800 experiences one more major clog, I may be ready to throw it through the window. One of the hardest aspects to overcome is knowing if the print you made is really the best it can possibly be. Color management and the dozens of options you need to be wary of in working with today’s digital printers are not easy things to understand or concepts to get clear in your head. One miss of a small check box and you may as well position your garbage can right next to your printer’s output tray.

Michael Reichmann and Jeff Schewe have done a tremendous service to the community in filming a tutorial series called From Camera to Print. I am giving them an unsolicited plug because I think it is very well done and offers an enormous amount of information at an incredible value. I personally learn more from watching videos or listening to audio than I do from reading books. It just seems to sink in better with me personally. The way Michael and Jeff present this tutorial in a conversational style discussing everything from capture to final framing and matting really offers a complete picture on the state of the art in digital printing. They clear some of the fog that often surrounds this entire topic and processes to the final stage of a photograph.

The series is lengthy – over 6 hours – and best digested a little bit at a time. If you have any confusion about color management and optimizing your images from capture to sharpening to the final print, the $35 spent is miniscule compared to the troubles and confusion it may save you in the future. And even if you think you know quite a bit already, I think you will pick up a few Lightroom or Photoshop tips that will make it just as worthwhile. But be warned, the $35 is also small compared to some of the tools you might want to pick up after watching this.  For you rebels that still like to shoot in JPEG instead of RAW, you might see your rebel side softened a bit.

Both of these guys agree that the process today can get very complicated. We can only hope that this stuff will become simpler in the future. Reichmann makes a statement that will likely come true. We will look back on these processes (and this video series) in the future and refer to it as the “Dark age of Digital Printing.”

Highly recommended!

  • Share/Bookmark

Firewire 800 upgrades

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007

It is hard to believe I am already feeling a bit cramped with nearly 2 TB (terabytes) of storage space. I imagine digital photographers of the future will be having 2 TB flash cards and look upon this as a joke like we often do when looking back at storing photos on a floppy disk. But as my photo archive grows and similarly the backups of that archive grow, it seems to disappear much faster than I expected. I can purchase some new hard drives to expand my NAS boxes, but it was a little bit cheaper for me to try out a Western Digital MyBook 500 GB. The one aspect of this drive that appealed to me in particular was that it was Firewire 800 compatible and that I had some extra space inside my computer to add a Firewire 800 card.
I know this souped up version of firewire is no cutting edge news (and there are probably even faster drives with SATA, etc), but I suppose I only recently understood just how fast it is, even on my now ancient Pentium 4 computer. If I may get a little geeky on you – I can transfer files to my USB2 drive or my NAS at about 24 MB/s (megabytes). My internal hard drives drives work in the neighborhood of 40-45 MB/s. A quick test on this MyBook drive is around 78 MB/s (read) / 57 MB/s (write). Not quite to the ‘rated speeds,’ but that seems pretty darn fast for an external drive and certainly a lot more than I am used to.

Since I was adding Firewire 800 capability, I also decided to get a Lexar Firewire 800 reader. I have yet to try this out yet, but I am expecting my flash card downloads aren’t going to be a start and walkaway event anymore. I can also connect the card reader directly to the back of this new hard drive because you can daisy-chain Firewire devices together – very convenient in trying to organize all this stuff on an already cluttered desk.

So if you are out shopping for more storage space for your images, give drives that offer Firewire 800 some serious consideration. (Note this is much different than Firewire 400 (1394a) – different cables, and much faster!) The one I purchased has very good reviews from multiple sources. Even if your computer doesn’t have a Firewire 800 (generic name 1394b) port – the cards to add some are very inexpensive and take 5 minutes to install inside your computer.

Now I just have to organize what I am going to put where..

  • Share/Bookmark

Mind melding

Monday, August 20th, 2007

I heard a rather interesting story on NPR the other morning, a piece from their “This I Believe” series. It was a piece by poet George Bowering that described the connection of music in a way I had never heard or read before. Overall it was about much more, but I liked this part in particular. And it prompted me to think about if this similar connection applies to viewing photographs or other artwork. Here is the key quote;

Sometimes when you are listening to a great jazz musician performing a long solo, you are experiencing his mind, moment by moment, as it shifts and decides, as it adds and reminds. This happens whether the player is a saxophone player or a bass player or a pianist. You are in there, where that other mind is. His mind is coming through your ears and inside your mind. – George Bowering

In my mind, I came to the conclusion that this is difficult to apply to visual art, or perhaps not to this degree. With music I can fully understand it and love this way of looking at it. But in photography, as much as we would like to think we are communicating clearly exactly why we made a certain image, the connection isn’t perhaps as intimate as is being described here.

SL8585.jpgPerhaps it is because an image is the end result of a series of processes, inclusions, eliminations, and considerations by the photographer are already finished. A viewer isn’t connected to the formation of a photograph like a listener is to music. For that matter, is it really important to a viewer that I paced back and forth on a beach before picking a certain group of rocks to include in an image.? Does it really matter that I applied a curve adjustment here or saturation there? Although it is an integral part of creation of the final piece, I don’t think for a viewer that they feel more connected to a photographer’s mind by knowing these little bits.

I utilize the saying that owning a piece of art is like owning a piece of the artist in my bio. I think this applies to pretty much any artform. But the ‘live’ experience is much different. As much as I love George’s way of describing the experience of music between musician and listener, I only wish the same type of connection could be between photographer and viewer. I think the viewer gets short-changed a little. After all, you don’t get to experience getting up a 4 am, swatting the gazillion biting flies, sinking in quicksand – for a silly picture. ;-)

  • Share/Bookmark

Magic, Mystery and appreciation

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

When I first started photographing nature, I was in complete awe of the shots I would see in magazines. Even before I got serious about photography, I still enjoyed these pictures as a ‘casual observer’, but they were foreign to me in their creation. Somehow what was once very mysterious became almost magical to me once I picked up a camera. The photographers were wielding some secret powers not worthy of mere mortals. It was pretty easy to stick many of the famous photographers on pedestals. I would constantly compare to images I made myself recognizing how far off I was to replicating what I saw. As I learned more and grew with my own images – some of the mystery started to disappear and I became less interested in the mechanics of how someone made a certain image. It wasn’t that I already knew how either, the process or the tools just became less interesting and some of the pedestals noticeably lower.

But what I did discover is that just because the mystery and ‘magic’ had dissipated some for me, it began turning more into a deeper appreciation of the vision and artistry behind the images I liked. I became less enthused about images I was impressed by (and in awe of) in the past. I no longer say ‘wow’ to many shots that I once did (even including some of my own). I can appreciate it is a good shot – but what it takes to really move me has changed greatly. I think as artists learn and grow more with their art, their tastes and opinion changes on the works of others, and the work of our own past. We redefine the mysterious and magical. When the magic of yesterday has faded, I look for the magic of tomorrow to create more inspiration. This is a big part of why I find it so hard to judge someone else’s work at times – everyone is at different places on their own timelines, perhaps even on different paths. Who am I to cause a detour or place a stop sign in their journey?

SL8587.jpg

As I have written about before, I draw parallels between my photographic experience and my feeble attempts at learning to play the guitar. I am still very much a beginner. I still have a lot of those notions of magic, mystery, and pedestals when it comes to guitar playing. But when I draw parallels between my guitar playing with some of my experience as a photographer, I can’t help but notice many similarities in how I feel towards learning, the frustrations, and feelings of inadequacy. I don’t have much vision of where I am headed – only that I just want to play better.

Having recently seen Rocco Deluca at a small venue in Detroit reinforced the feelings of awe and ‘magic’ even further. The guy is damn good for those of you who are not familiar with him. I really can’t imagine myself ever playing like that but in my dreams. Rocco and many other gifted musicians still hold that somewhat untouchable status to me. Learning the mechanics of what they do is hard enough, but the artistry and emotion behind their work is an entirely different aspect to grasp. If it is anything like photography, I expect it isn’t something that can be taught, but is simply acquired as you continue to learn, grow and have those defineable ‘Ah-Ha!’ moments.

I expect that if my perseverance holds up with learning guitar, I will end up going through some changes in how I feel about music as well. I am already trying to draw upon my path in photography, which still has so many unknown roads to explore. And even though some of the mystery may dissipate, I hope I will continue to have those ‘AH HA!” moments of revelation in both pursuits. A little bit of magic to reach for couldn’t hurt either.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Share/Bookmark