Archive for October, 2007

Water versus Rock

Monday, October 29th, 2007

I just got back from a very quick photo trip for a couple days to the Cleveland area, about a 3.5 hr drive from where I live. I went primarily to photograph wood ducks in a spot known for their approachability, but also ended up being able to explore some other areas of Ohio I am not familiar with. Ever since visiting Hocking Hills a couple of years ago, the impression of Ohio has changed in my mind considerably. Basically most of my exposure to the state was along the I-75 corridor, mostly flat farmland, and where I go for bird migrations – also flat. But venture into central southern and eastern Ohio, and you discover a vast array of gorges and small canyons that are all part of the Lake Erie watershed, with some decent elevations and waterfalls.

WA8676.jpgI know waterfalls are often viewed as overdone and perhaps a bit trite as subject matter, but I still like to shoot them. I enjoy them not only for the typical dramatic element to a landscape, but because they create opportunities for a lot of other ‘intimate landscapes’ within and around them. They can be challenging to come up with something original. However, you can do a lot with flowing water – shoot it slow, shoot it fast – shoot it polarized or not – with fall colors or vibrant green spring foliage. I like the image here because it make me think of a water versus rock concept in approaches to photographing certain subjects. The rock shown here isn’t budging, stubborn as can be. The water accepts that the rock is not moving, and simply goes around it.

You can be a rock in your approach to certain subjects, rarely moving from your comfort zone – only turning or moving if someone forces you. You can avoid subjects like waterfalls completely – because they have been ‘done to death.’ On the other hand, perhaps as a rock you have found your place and there is no reason to move. Or you can be water, and move and flow in whatever environment you find yourself in, try to make the best of a situation. Sometimes you are predictable, other times not so much. Having a rock attitude or a water attitude can greatly influence how we perceive the world around us and in our viewfinders. It greatly affects our ability to react to adverse situations.

I have my rock days, and my water days. I probably have rock attitudes and water attitudes towards specific subjects also. As long as we recognize these factors of our perception, we may be able to move past creative hurdles and boundaries.

  • Share/Bookmark

$1,375 per gallon

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

What is it? Liquid nitrogen? Molten gold? Gas prices in 2425? Special medicine? How about liquid uranium? What could be so expensive? And worse yet, what company that sells you such a precious commodity would also make you dump a good portion of it right down the drain? This liquid is used by a special machine – and you would think it would conserve it as much as possible. This stuff is a hot commodity.

WA6532L.jpgI am referring to the actual cost of Epson K3 inks that I use in my 4800 printer. And since these are larger bulk cartridges, they are actually some of the lower cost/gallon inks out there. And if you haven’t guessed already, I am growing increasingly frustrated with clogging that causes this expensive commodity to be flushed right down the drain. Year to date, since I track just how much this beast is wasting – has cost me nearly $270 in wasted ink. I can only imagine what some of the larger format printers go through.

If it weren’t for the clogging, I would be fairly happy with this printer. The print quality is excellent (at $1,375/gallon – it better be!) Give me the ability to use both types of black ink at once, and a printer that profiles itself – and I am in heaven. Wait Epson . there are now machines out there that do this!

Epson used to be pretty much the only game in town for fine art printing, and I think they got lazy. They are now paying the price by giving up a little bit of that market share to other manufacturers who capitalized on their weaknesses. I have been printing images on Epson printers for over 10 years. Perhaps it is time for a change.

I am sure there is a marketing gimmick in there somewhere for fine art prints produced with pigments costing this much. Maybe the next time I get a clog, I will clean the heads with Dom Pérignon champagne. After all, I can get some of that for $656 / gallon. What a bargain!

  • Share/Bookmark

Trying new things from a neck pillow

Sunday, October 21st, 2007

TR8663.jpg

I was out this morning poking around trying to take advantage of the quickly fading fall colors. I have really had the urge to try some different things lately. I ended up shooting mostly standard stuff unfortunately. I was heading back to my car because the sun was getting quite bright and I was feeling a bit discouraged I didn’t really create many original things today.

In this area of a cedar grove, I was looking at the base of two of them that formed themselves in the U-shape of a neck pillow close to the ground. And I thought – hey – that looks quite comfortable! I dropped my pack, set down my tripod, and proceeded to try out this natural neck pillow. The ground was covered in a scattering of soft cedar leaves and bark shavings – I was ready to take a nap. What I saw next was similar to what you see here, and I started playing around with various things in zooming my camera to emphasize the height above me.

Just goes to show you never know when an idea may present itself – even lying down on the job. :-)

  • Share/Bookmark

Five things I hate about nature

Saturday, October 20th, 2007

LE8660.jpgYes, don’t believe the stereotype,folks, about how deeply in love nature photographers are with nature. Sure we can go on and on about the peace we find, the beauty of finding order in chaos, and all the things that stir our souls. But let’s face it, I’ll bet even John Muir had some particular aspects he could do without. Here’s my top five;

  1. Mosquitoes : the scurge of the earth. I know they are food for some critters, but hey, they will find something else to eat. I will gladly contribute to the development of a mosquito-like vitamin supplement for any animal that simply can’t do without. It is quite sad to see so many animals threatened with extinction, while this one thrives. That threat needs to be redirected!
  2. Biting Flies : The annoying cousin of enemy number one. I think they team up together actually. While you might seek some relief from mosquitoes in some sunny spots, that is where the flies are hiding around the corner to get you. And even when they are not biting, they are buzzing around your head making you think they are biting. Jump on the train to extinction guys along with your detested cousins.
  3. Poison Ivy : This stuff grows crazy in the woods around my house making a majority of the area unnavigable most of the year. Normally I am quite careful because I do have a reaction to it. A couple of weeks ago I was in an area away from my house and not as careful. It was putting on its ‘oooh I turn fall colors too’ disguise and I must have picked up some on my boots or my pants. Well, it is popping up in various places on me now and I don’t know where it is coming from! It can grow into massive vines that take over the largest trees. Ivy be gone!
  4. Fall Colors don’t last long enough : Two months out of 12? What kind of deal is that? The season of “Fall” is supposed to be Sept 22 to Dec 21 – I sense a slacker. Perhaps 12 out of 12 is asking too much, might even get boring – but peak color seems to come and go in a blink of an eye. Usually a rain or windstorm comes along right around peak time and blows leaves down before you can enjoy them. Thankfully you get rid of the mosquitoes and flies around this time. You could probably get the most of it by being a gypsy and follow it from North to South. But that isn’t an option for most of us, in our time available or our wardrobe.
  5. Your tolerance for our trespass : Ultimately in the end, I know nature will always prevail. But you allow us to take too much while giving too little. We impose, we pollute, we destroy. While your scale of time is so much broader than ours, I think you need to kick us in the pants a bit more often. Maybe the mosquitoes and flies make more sense..hmmm.

If you have any items of hatred you would like to share, please comment or post in your own blog with a link back here. .  Thanks for reading.  ;-)

  • Share/Bookmark

Signing photographs

Wednesday, October 17th, 2007

I find the array of answers interesting whenever I see the question “what is the proper way to sign a fine art print?” I am reminded of an older podcast by Brooks Jensen on signing prints where he asks some probing questions himself, and acknowledges there are no resolving answers. Even the ‘traditional’ art community has different methods across a variety of mediums. Of course many photographers have different ways they think is the right way. LE8658.jpgSome sign the mat, some sign the print off the image, some on the back (??), or like me, sign directly on the image itself. (I use a somewhat abstract monogram) Some of the strong stances about how it must be done amaze me at times. From a consumer’s standpoint, it is almost always a desired to have it signed in some way. And therein lies two distinct viewpoints – of the artists’ intent vs. the value to the owner of the work.

Does having the artist’s signature separate it from something from a mass production factory? (Though certainly there are mass produced signatures!) Does it make it appear more authentic? I think everyone has their own reasons. I have seen reference to how Pablo Picasso referred to the signing of artwork as indication it is ready for abandonment.

Although commonly done by some photography masters of old, I don’t see much value in the signing of a mat board – it can be replaced, and your signature is discarded with the trash. Of course, if someone doesn’t order a matted print, it isn’t even an option. So some people end up signing both to have a visible signature, yet not feel they are ‘interfering’ with the image. Signing the back seems rather pointless, particularly if an image ends up being mounted. So it really comes down to signing on or off the actual image and paper it is reproduced on. Does it matter if it is visible or not?

As Brooks mentions in his podcast, signatures can be talking points of the art collector – perhaps even a bragging point of authenticity. For the photographer, perhaps an indication of an image finally being at its final stage. The work has a final blessing.

If it is a distraction to have a signature on an image as some claim, then why is it common practice for painters to have obvious signatures on their works? I have never understood why it may be accepted for one and not the other. I think a photographer can take the worries about possible distraction into consideration. It should not be signed in a manner where it becomes a focal point, but merely an accent.

Brooks suggests having a good, consistent reasoning for signing your images. We all put a lot of effort into composing a shot to begin with, and perhaps even more effort in creation of a final print. I have never seen anything wrong with showing a bit of pride and self-confidence in that.

These are some of the pens that I have found work really well on prints and canvas:

  • Share/Bookmark

In search of symbiotic subjects

Sunday, October 7th, 2007

One of the ‘themes’ I have been looking for while out in the field are situations where all of the elements have some type of symbiotic, circular relationship. It it more of a visual, thematic relationship rather than a biological symbiotic one. I have it as an ongoing project to collect certain images all pertaining to this theme.

leaf photography pictures images fine artFor example, this leaf image is one of my most recent shots. I liked the visually interesting patterned log of a fallen tree, then there is an oak leaf, that is also shaped like a tree. All of the elements of the image have some type of circular relationship to a central theme of trees and interlinked with each other – fallen tree, fallen leaf, shape of the leaf in shape of a tree, etc.

These things are incredibly difficult to find in chaos of nature sometimes. They are even more difficult to find in simplified form – there always seems to be one particular element that doesn’t fit in perfectly – and essentially ruins the concept. I shot this other image last fall, again of a leaf. I liked the hole in the leaf was actually in the shape of a leaf. The hole looks like a leaf hanging from a tree branch. Leaves, trees, and roots seem to have the best graphical elements to work into this particular theme because their features are so similar.

LE8348.jpg

Using software tools like Lightroom makes it easier to keep track of long term projects like this. I just drag and drop images that seem to fit the theme into a custom category for future reference. Hopefully I will accumulate enough of them to warrant some type of publishing of the entire collection as a group.

  • Share/Bookmark

Saturated with information

Wednesday, October 3rd, 2007

If you read this blog, I would guess that you read a few others as well. I do too. My Google Reader list has about 80 of them and seems to be growing. There is another bunch in my sidebar. This is in addition to podcasts that I download to my iPod, video tutorials I try to keep up with over at the Radiant Vista, Lightroom sites, etc. I have also been subscribing to artist blog sites like Clint Watson’s Fine art Views, Kristy Hall, Art Biz blog, Art Print Issues, etc, etc. Mailing lists, forums, and tigers oh my!

Quite frankly, I can’t keep up. There is just too much information out there these days. I want to keep learning and stay informed, keep up with fellow bloggers, but I think it is costing me too much time in doing other things. My guitar practice is suffering.  Being a Nikon user, I would normally be reading all about the latest camera and lens releases – but I have pretty much tried to ignore much of the chatter. I barely know the specs of any of the new cameras.

I really do appreciate all the loyal visitors here, and I try to reciprocate as much as possible. But I think I need to step back and re-evaluate some of these things. I have already cut back my participation in various forums, I stopped posting images to other sites a long time ago. I try to blog about meaningful things that are on my mind, and you good folks have helped clear the fog, or at least wade through it with me. I could never commit to a post or picture every single day.

So.. I just wanted to say thanks for continuing to visit. I am not sure where my ‘re-evaluation’ will put me as far as my activity level. Only so many hours in the day – and so much wasted good light!

foggy river wetlands fog

  • Share/Bookmark