Archive for May, 2008

Picasso Marble

Friday, May 30th, 2008

I am a bit of a loss for words lately and also running frantic gathering things together before I leave town. .  My ‘day job’ is sending me off to Germany and the Czech Republic for a week. .  Probably no time for pictures though.  Always interesting experiencing other cultures and lands – though I absolutely hate flying. .  Airplanes simply are not designed to accommodate someone who is 6′7″. . .  It is always a hassle trying to jockey for the seats with a bit more leg room against 300 other people probably with their eyes on the same seats – whether they really need them or not  .  Inevitably I end up in a standard seat and then battle with the person in front of me who insists that the seat really can recline past my kneecaps. .  Did I mention I hate flying?

RO8831.jpgSo this a bit more chaotic image of picasso marble not only describes how I have been running around everywhere tying things up, but also a bit like all the driving that will be done when I am over there  .  Plus, I think I could use some of the good things associated with picasso marble according to some folklore:

Self-control, Clarity, and total recall of dreams. Assists in meditation. Protects, nurtures, strengthens. Aids in mind expansion and manifestation of physical and material goals. Stability. Helps to heal viral infection.

Take care folks, and have a good week.

  • Share/Bookmark

Green photographic papers

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

TR8830.jpgQuite often when you read about new inkjet papers, most of the discussion is centered around characteristics such as DMax, gamut, archivalness, optical brighteners, feel, weight, durability, etc, etc. .  It is disappointing that you don’t read a lot about sustainability. .  Afterall, it seems to be one of the key environmental buzzwords of the time.  “Recycled” is rarely a word mentioned when it comes to photographic prints, probably for a variety of reasons  .  As a consumer of fine art inkjet paper for both personal and professional uses, I have been thinking about this.

It is then a great coincidence that a reader of my blog, Dr. Joe Zammit-Lucia, introduced himself to me recently   In this introduction, he pointed me also to a paper he authored about inkjet papers and how some are greener than others.  I found it to be a great introduction to the subject and wanted to share it with his permission. .  You can download this paper from his site here.

I was pleased to find out that my standard fine art papers, which are 100% cotton rag – as well as the mat boards I use – are rated very well according to the analysis in Green-in-Print. .  It is also happens to be a nice benefit that cotton rag materials tend to be the most archival   But Dr. Zammit-Lucia’s article cautions that labels can be deceiving, and possibly for marketing purposes above anything else. .  The fine details of the processing are often not publically available, or perhaps not even known by some paper manufacturer representatives. .  It is worthwhile to ask questions that might go deeper than the marketing materials.

The main intent of my post is to encourage reading of the paper linked above, pass it around (use the “Share This” icon below), and encourage others to generate questions to the paper manufacturers.  Let them know there is a demand for green inkjet papers that have all of the other great qualities we are after. .  Let them know that sustainability should be a key factor just as much as Dmax and gamut.

Below is some suggested letter text from Dr. Zammit-Lucia to send to your favorite paper manufacturer:

I am looking to optimize the environmental friendliness of our photographic papers.  In this regard, I would like to inquire as to whether your company is aware of the recently published Green-In-Print report (it can be downloaded at the Green-in-Print menu option at www.jzlimages.com) and whether you intend to take up the use of the Green-in-Print labeling suggested in the report as this would help me tremendously in evaluating the suitability of your paper products.

Meantime, I would be grateful if you could please provide me with the following details about your individual 100% cotton paper products:

Does your company have systems in place to enable each paper product produced to be tracked back to individual mills and individual fiber source?
Are all the manufacturers involved in the chain of production of your cotton papers ISO 14001 certified?
For which of your cotton papers (if any) is the de-lignification process chlorine free and is it totally chlorine free or elemental chlorine free?
Are the mills certified by the Chlorine Free products association?
Do any of your cotton papers contain a resin base or coating?

Many thanks for your assistance.

Kind regards.

  • Share/Bookmark

New rock abstract pictures

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

I have uploaded some new rock images to my stone abstracts gallery:

New rock pictures include:

Picasso Marble

Namibia Pietersite

Red Mushroom Jasper

Amethyst Sage (with dendrites that resemble trees)

All are available as fine art prints, canvas, and for rock stock! :-)

  • Share/Bookmark

Association with the familiar

Friday, May 23rd, 2008

RO8820.jpgWhile photographing this particular piece of pietersite, I couldn’t help notice a section of it that resembled a waterfall. .  It seems to happen that way when we view abstracts.  Our minds try to make sense of it by trying to associate what we are seeing with something familiar. .  Normally just some interesting patterns are enough to make me want to photograph them. .  But in this case, I couldn’t see anything BUT a waterfall. .  It actually affected some of the compositions I was making, because I felt the need for the areas that look like water to be flowing downward. . .  I even tried to break that perception by slipping the stone around in various ways, but nothing else seemed to ‘look right.’. . .  So I succumbed to what my brain was telling me and made the arrangements look like segments of a waterfall.

RO8822.jpg

  • Share/Bookmark

Human spamming scum

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

Sorry folks if you have seen the occasional strange comment post get in the blog lately   It seems over the past 6 months there is a new type of spammer emerging – actual humans set on getting some type of advertising link into my post comments vs. some other type of automated spam   They actually type some type of comment that might be related to the post, but with. ulterior. motives I think  Since I can’t monitor 24/7, some of them slip through  Since they appear to be posted by some random individual, they sneak past my spam plugin.

What a job that must be – just as bad as a telemarketer  I wonder if they pay by the comment or the incoming links they generate?. 

So if you see anything strange, or a comment show up to an old post – do not grant them the desired clicks  they want   I will mark them as evil spammers destined to spend eternity cleaning up cigarette butts on street corners or cleaning the filters of sewage plants as soon as I catch them.

  • Share/Bookmark

Dry Mounting

Saturday, May 17th, 2008

Mounting methods for artwork are usually an interesting topic because people always seem to be asking what is the best way, or best method, etc, etc. While I don’t claim to know the best way, I can tell you that I have experimented with quite a few and ultimately decided upon dry mounting as my standard method. So I thought I would write a little about what is dry mounting and the reasons I ended up here.

When mounting photographs, quite often you will see references to something called T-hinge or hinge mounting. This involves laying a photograph face up on a backing board, placing a couple pieces of archival type tape sticky side up so that half of the tape is behind the print and the other half exposed. Then another piece of tape (sticky side down) is placed over that exposed piece to ultimately resemble the shape of a “T”. The image is said to be able to float and ‘breathe’ to changing humidity conditions this way. It is also considered a conservation mounting method because no damage is done to the original piece and it is removable from the backing board. It is considered one of the best methods for one-of-a-kind pieces of art.

I used this method many, many years ago until I got burned with some prints that I had sold on commission to a gallery in Northern Michigan. I thought I was doing the “right thing” by the art conservationists way of things. Well, some of these prints ended up developing some slight waviness to them and looked terrible depending on the angle they were viewed at. It was quite embarrassing and I vowed I never wanted to see that look again. Now, this could have been the particular paper the prints were on, could have been particular environmental conditions they were in, etc – and not just due to using a hinge mount. But it had me thinking about the things I could or couldn’t control once the print left my hands. I have read many people that claim to have no issues with this method, perhaps only with thicker papers and smaller prints. But how can you be certain because you don’t have continuous feedback from everywhere they are displayed?

So I played a little with adhesive peel offs, which were a pain for air bubbles and positioning, and also few seemed to use an acid-free adhesive. Sprays were too messy. A photographer friend of mine had a dry mount press and I began to learn a little about those. Dry mounting involves a rather heavy piece of equipment called a press (appx. 80-90 lbs), heat, and some thin tissue paper that becomes adhesive at certain temperatures. By sandwiching the tissue between the print and a backing board (acid free all around of course) and placing it in the press – the print becomes permanently mounted to the board and is completely flat. The nice part – it stays this way. These presses can be found on Ebay, which is where I bought mine and you save quite a bit by buying them used. Here is the process:
1. The mounting tissue is cut from a roll to the size of the print
2. Using a “Tacking Iron” (shown in the foreground of the pic here) – you tack the tissue to the back of the print in a couple of places to prevent it from moving (it is rather smooth, slippery stuff). You use Release Paper between the iron and the tissue to keep the tissue from sticking to the iron.
pressphoto.jpg
3. You flip the print face up on the backing board where it now slides around because of the piece of slippery tissue on the back. You can take a cut mat and position the print properly within the window to make sure everything lines up. Using the Tacking iron again, you now tack down using the release paper again on the face of the print in some small spots to keep the print from sliding around on the backing board. You have to be careful with the heat of the iron to not damage the print – only 10 seconds or so is required to get the materials to stick.
4. Now the print and board are ready to go into the press. The press has a big top platen that heats up to whatever temperature you set it at. Temperature can vary by the type of tissue you are using. Mine is set around 180 deg F. You lay the print/board/tissue combo in there (already fixed by the tacking iron to keep things from moving) – and close the press. This clamps the whole thing down quite hard and applies the heat to melt the rest of the tissue. You only need to leave it in for enough time to create a good bond across the entire surface. I use 50 seconds to 1 minute (Good to have a clock nearby) – so not too much time at all.
5. Open the press and take the print out to cool. Depending on the board you mount to, some recommend you place a heavy metal plate on top of it while it cools to prevent warping. I have never had an issue mounting to 3/16″ foamcore with warping, so I have never used the plate idea.

Dry mounting is held in some disregard by some art conservationists because it generally isn’t reversible. If something isn’t reversible, it is said to decrease its long term value if an original piece of art is mounted this way. I can understand this completely.

For photographs however, a digital print is never a one-of-a-kind original piece of work like a painting or collage might be. As long as the backing board is never damaged significantly, there should never be a reason to need to change it. The top mat can of course be changed, just not the print/backing board combination. In worst case situations, the print / board can be replaced. There are now some products on the market for dry mounting, like ArtCare Restore board, if reversibility is a major concern. Some sites also publish misinformation regarding dry mounting inkjet prints, stating the heat will ruin them. I can only say that having mounted hundreds of prints on a variety of papers, using a variety of inksets, it has never been an issue at the temperatures I am using.

For me, this is a small tradeoff in exchange for knowing the print will never develop the waviness I have seen once framed. If a gallery curator should ever object, I know that there are alternatives like the Artcare board that address both concerns. With heavier fine art papers and smaller size prints – perhaps some success can be had with t-hinging alone. But how do you know for sure? How do you know the environment a sold print will be displayed in? I just know that once you have been burned, it is hard to gain the confidence back that your print will never experience the wavies again. For me, dry mounting is the solution.

  • Share/Bookmark

Do what you say you will do

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Sorry folks for the lull in content around here lately  I have been quite busy on several fronts and haven’t had much that trilled me in shooting over the past couple of weeks   A trip I took to Magee Marsh in Ohio for warblers was a total bust   I have a backup on some orders that require matting and Light Impressions really screwed up on an order I placed with them   I understand that mistakes are to be made everywhere, but it has always said a lot to me about a company in the way they handle their mistakes      They were accepting of the mistake, so I will give them credit for that, but why is it so hard for customer service folks to actually call you back when they say they will call you back?  Two times this happened to me in handling this particular issue – with two different people    Really poor communication, and they have yet to fix a pricing mistake on their website that I have written and talked to them about three times now   One of my biggest pet peeves is people that don’t do what they say they will do   If they weren’t the only source for a particular type of mat board I use, this probably would have been my final order  I am willing to give them a second chance out of necessity, but their customer service leaves a lot to be desired.

In contrast, I contacted some weeks ago a bird feeder company Hiatt Manufacturing – that makes the Stokes Select brand bird feeders   I had two bird feeders that failed in the exact same welded joint  I contacted them because I thought it was a manufacturing defect to have it happen twice   They responded within hours, (a manufacturing company that probably doesn’t deal direct with consumers much) and although stated I was the only complaint they ever had with these feeders, they immediately offered to send replacements and an extra    They also indicated they would be working to improve the design.

Customer service is such a mixed bag these days, often more towards the lacking than the exceptional  But when you get really great service, that has quite an impact because it is so rare. 

  • Share/Bookmark